NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / February 1, 2023 / Levi & Korsinsky, LLP announces that class action lawsuits have commenced on behalf of shareholders of the following publicly-traded companies. Shareholders interested in serving as lead plaintiff have until the deadlines listed to petition the court. Further details about the cases can be found at the links provided. There is no cost or obligation to you.
SGLY Shareholders Click Here: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/singularity-future-technology-lawsuit-submission-form?prid=36137&wire=1
AVYA Shareholders Click Here: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/avaya-holdings-loss-submission-form?prid=36137&wire=1
ARBK Shareholders Click Here: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/argo-blockchain-lawsuit-submission-form?prid=36137&wire=1
* ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BELOW *
Singularity Future Technology Ltd. (NASDAQ:SGLY)
SGLY Lawsuit on behalf of: investors who purchased February 12, 2021 - November 17, 2022
Lead Plaintiff Deadline : February 7, 2023
TO LEARN MORE, VISIT: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/singularity-future-technology-lawsuit-submission-form?prid=36137&wire=1
According to the filed complaint, during the class period, Singularity Future Technology Ltd. made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the Company had misrepresented the true educational background of its former CEO, Yang Jie; 2) Yang Jie had an outstanding arrest warrant in China, had committed forgery, and was the largest shareholder and VP of Finance for a Nasdaq-listed lending company, China Commercial Credit ('CCC'), which failed after reporting massive losses; (3) there existed material related party transactions with SOS Information Technology New York Inc. (where Jie's wife was Vice President) and Rich Trading, whose CEO was defendant Lei Nie, the husband of Singularity CFO Tuo Pan; (4) Singularity director John Levy had been a director at CCC from January 2013 through December 2016 as CCC failed amidst detailed allegations that Jie, when he was an executive and shareholder in CCC, misappropriated assets; (5) the Company lacked adequate internal controls, and as a result had a heightened risk of scrutiny and was ultimately subject to a United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and SEC investigation and action as well as a potential delisting by NASDAQ; and (6) as a result, the Company's statements during the class period about the historical financial and operational metrics and purported market opportunities did not accurately reflect the actual business, operations, and financial results and trajectory of the Company, and were materially false and misleading and lacked a factual basis.
Avaya Holdings Corp. (NYSE:AVYA)
AVYA Lawsuit on behalf of: investors who purchased November 22, 2021 - November 29, 2022
Lead Plaintiff Deadline : March 6, 2023
TO LEARN MORE, VISIT: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/avaya-holdings-loss-submission-form?prid=36137&wire=1
According to the filed complaint, during the class period, Avaya Holdings Corp. made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) the Company's internal control over financial reporting was deficient in several areas; (ii) as a result of these deficiencies, the Company had failed to design and maintain effective controls over its whistleblower policies and its ethics and compliance program; (iii) the Company's deteriorating financial condition was likely to raise substantial doubt as to its ability to continue as a going concern; and (iv) as a result, the Company's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
Argo Blockchain plc (NASDAQ:ARBK)
This lawsuit is on behalf of persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired: (a) Argo American Depository Shares pursuant and/or traceable to the documents issued in connection with the Company's initial public offering conducted on or about September 23, 2021; and/or (b) Argo securities between September 23, 2021 and October 10, 2022, both dates inclusive.
Lead Plaintiff Deadline : March 27, 2023
TO LEARN MORE, VISIT: https://www.zlk.com/pslra-1/argo-blockchain-lawsuit-submission-form?prid=36137&wire=1
According to the filed complaint, (i) Argo was highly susceptible to and/or suffered from significant capital constraints, electricity and other costs, and network difficulties; (ii) the foregoing issues hampered Argo's ability to mine Bitcoin or Bitcoin equivalents, execute its business strategy, meet its obligations, and operate its Helios facility; (iii) as a result, Argo's business was less sustainable than defendants had led investors to believe; (iv) accordingly, Argo's business and financial prospects were overstated; and (v) as a result, the documents issued in connection with the Company's initial public offering and defendants' public statements throughout the class period were materially false and/or misleading and failed to state information required to be stated therein.
You have until the lead plaintiff deadlines to request that the court appoint you as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff.
Levi & Korsinsky is a nationally recognized firm with offices in New York, California, Connecticut, and Washington D.C. The firm's attorneys have extensive expertise and experience representing investors in securities litigation and have recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders. Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.
Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
Joseph E. Levi, Esq.
Eduard Korsinsky, Esq.
55 Broadway, 10th Floor
New York, NY 10006
Tel: (212) 363-7500
Fax: (212) 363-7171
SOURCE: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP
View source version on accesswire.com: